"Students participate in 'die-in,' Peace Prize nominee speaks to capacity crowd"
November 6, 2007
By
Enlarge 
At the Intersection of Death’s roundabout yesterday, students participated in a silent “die-in” protest to recognize alleged human rights abuses against Palestinians in Israael. Hanan Ashwari also spoke.
“Peace in Palestine is an imperative,” Hanan Ashwari told a packed Kresge Auditorium last night in a speech entitled “Palestine: Is Peace Possible?”
“The essential first step toward a resolution in Palestine is the liberation of Palestine from the shackles of occupation,” said Ashwari, a Palestinian Christian activist. “There is a real need for Israel to stop being an occupier. Once Palestine is freed, then peace talks will be viable.”
Ashwari has won a number of peace prizes, including the 2003 Sydney Peace Prize, and she was nominated for the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize. She also serves on multiple international advisory boards, including the World Bank Middle East. Ashwari’s visit was co-sponsored by a number of Stanford organizations, including Students Confronting Apartheid by Israel (SCAI).
“A few weeks ago, another speaker came to Stanford and proposed the one-state solution to the Palestinian conflict,” said Nabill Idrisi ‘09, co-president of SCAI. “It was definitely very interesting to hear Ashwari defend her argument for the two-state solution.”
In her speech, Ashwari expressed confidence that peace in Palestine would be possible with direct political action and genuine commitment from all international and Palestinian parties.
However, Ashwari also outlined certain obstacles that would have to be overcome before peace talks could occur, the first of which was the Israeli occupation in Palestine.
She criticized the transformation of Palestine into a “charity case rather than a case of self-determination and freedom.” She affirmed that the majority of Palestinians “have been protective of their fundamental rights and want to build a state based on democracy and human rights.”
In addition, Ashwari referred to the concrete structure being built in Jerusalem as a “horrific wall that is stealing our horizon and our land.”
She also stressed the concept of sharing Jerusalem among both Palestinians and Israelis.
“All Palestinians should be able to move through Jerusalem freely,” she said. “Many different views of Jerusalem exist, but we must keep Jerusalem whole as one city for two states.”
A large portion of the audience consisted of Bay Area Palestinian-Americans and Arab-Americans who were not affiliated with the University.
“She’s an articulate speaker and a representative of the Palestinian people,” said Vivian Zelaya, a Palestinian-American from San Francisco.
Certain students, however, expressed a degree of doubt regarding Ashwari’s arguments.
“Overall, her speech was pretty well-rounded, and I think she suggested a viable solution,” said Fadl Saadi ‘10. “Though I’m not sure how I feel about the idea of Jerusalem being the capital of two states.”
Joseph Gettinger ‘11, who spent a year in Israel after high school before coming to Stanford, said he wished Ashwari had been more specific in her speech.
“If she stands by what she said tonight, then she’s a moderate who will be key in bringing about a two-state solution,” Gettinger said. “I agree with 90 percent of what she said, but she was also vague. She insisted that concrete steps were necessary toward resolution, yet she didn’t suggest any of those concrete steps.”
